Analysis of Preеmptive Post-Operative Analgesia Optimized Programm Effectiveness as a Basis for Anti-Stress Providing after Hysterectomy


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Relevance The article presents the data of the original research to assess the clinical effectiveness of prevent and eliminate postoperative pain syndrome program after hysterectomy. The purpose of the study Improving the efficiency of complex anti-stress protection during hysterectomy based prevention and treatment optimization of postoperative pain syndrome. Materials and methods 80 gynecological patients with indications for hysterectomy. Among the investigated contingent differentiated two contrasting groups. 40 patients were included in the control group (using traditional program of analgesia). Another 40 patients were included in the study group (using the developed program of analgesia). Assessment of the pain intensity with application of modern analogue scales (visual analogue scale, digital rating scale); assessment of the stress-tension level of the autonomic nervous system by cardiointervalography with mathematical analysis of cardiac rhythm; descriptive statistical methods to determine the level of intergroup differences significance. Results and their discussion In the study group identified the best level of analgetic protection and neurovegetative stabilization. Proved the possibility o

Relevance The article presents the data of the original research to assess the clinical effectiveness of prevent and eliminate
postoperative pain syndrome program after hysterectomy.
The purpose of the study Improving the efficiency of complex anti-stress protection during hysterectomy based prevention and
treatment optimization of postoperative pain syndrome.
Materials and methods 80 gynecological patients with indications for hysterectomy. Among the investigated contingent
differentiated two contrasting groups. 40 patients were included in the control group (using traditional program of analgesia).
Another 40 patients were included in the study group (using the developed program of analgesia).
Assessment of the pain intensity with application of modern analogue scales (visual analogue scale, digital rating scale);
assessment of the stress-tension level of the autonomic nervous system by cardiointervalography with mathematical analysis of
cardiac rhythm; descriptive statistical methods to determine the level of intergroup differences significance.
Results and their discussion In the study group identified the best level of analgetic protection and neurovegetative stabilization.
Proved the possibility of prevention of postoperative pain syndrome severe forms in the studied conditions. All of identified
intergroup differences have a high level of statistical significance.
Conclusion The obtained results allow us to: statistically reasonably considered designed program of analgesia as a means of
optimizing the anti-stress support for gynecological interventions, recommend it to practical application.

f prevention of postoperative pain syndrome severe forms in the studied conditions. All of identified intergroup differences have a high level of statistical significance. Conclusion The obtained results allow us to: statistically reasonably considered designed program of analgesia as a means of optimizing the anti-stress support for gynecological interventions, recommend it to practical application.

About the authors

N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy, 10 Studencheskaia Str., Voronezh, 394036, Russian
Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: grroma@yandex.ru
applicant for the Department of anesthesiology and resuscitation of N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy

N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy, 10 Studencheskaia Str., Voronezh, 394036, Russian
Federation

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com
 post-graduate student of the Department of anesthesiology and resuscitation of N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy

N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy, 10 Studencheskaia Str., Voronezh, 394036, Russian
Federation

Email: alpebro@yandex.ru
applicant for the Department of anesthesiology and resuscitation of N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy

N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy, 10 Studencheskaia Str., Voronezh, 394036, Russian
Federation

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com
applicant for the Department of anesthesiology and resuscitation of N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy.

N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy, 10 Studencheskaia Str., Voronezh, 394036, Russian
Federation

Email: zirisha85@rambler.ru
applicant for the Department of anesthesiology and resuscitation of N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy

References

  1. Morgan G.E., Mikhail M.S.
  2. Klinicheskaia anesteziologiia. [Clinical anesthesiology.]
  3. M.: ZAO «Izdatel'stvo BINOM»,
  4. 1064].
  5. Dolina O.A. Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia. [ Anesthesiology and reanimatology.]
  6. Moscow,2009. 576.
  7. Gritsai A.N., Pereloma V.I. Vliianie uprezhdaiushchei
  8. analgezii na techenie anestezii i formirovanie bolevogo
  9. sindroma v rannem posleoperatsionnom periode. Desiatyi
  10. s"ezd Federatsii anesteziologov i reanimatologov.[Effect of pre-emptive
  11. analgesia and anesthesia for a formation of a painful
  12. syndrome in the early postoperative period.]
  13. Saint-Petersburg, 2006; 38-39.
  14. Ovechkin A.M., Gnezdilov A.V., Iurasov A.V. Lechenie
  15. posleoperatsionnoi boli – kachestvennaia klinicheskaia
  16. praktika [Postoperative Pain - Good Clinical Practice].
  17. Moscow: Meditsina Publ., 2003; 213.
  18. Ovechkin A.M., Sviridov S.V. Posleoperacionnaya bol' i
  19. obezbolivanie: sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy. [Postoperative pain and
  20. analgesia: current state of problem.]
  21. Regionarnaia anesteziia
  22. i lechenie ostroi boli. 2006; 1(0): 1-15.
  23. Kukushkin M.L. Patofiziologicheskie mekhanizmy
  24. sindromov.[Pathophysiological mechanisms of pain
  25. syndromes.]
  26. Bol'. 2003; 1(1): 5-12.
  27. Colin J.L Kachestvennyj sistemnyj analiz roli
  28. antagonisty NMDA v profilakticheskoj anal'gezii. Anesth. Analg.[A qualitative systemic review of the role of
  29. NMDA antagonists in preventive analgesia. Anesth. Analg.]
  30. ; 98: 1385-1400.
  31. Bonica J.J. Upravlenie bol'yu.[The management of pain.]
  32. Lea & Febiger, 1990.570
  33. Aveline C., Bonnet F. Effekty ehpidural'noj anestezii
  34. po prodolzhitel'nosti truda i sposoba dostavki. Anna. Fr. Anesth.
  35. Reanim.[The effects of peridural anesthesia
  36. on duration of labor and mode of delivery. Ann. Fr. Anesth.
  37. Reanim.] 2001; 20(5): 471-484.
  38. De Kock M.Rasshirenie gorizontov: perekhod ostroj boli
  39. k postoyannoj boli i ustanovlenie hronicheskoj posleoperacionnoj
  40. boli. Anesteziologiya. [Expending our horisons: transition of acute pain
  41. to persistent pain and establishment of chronic postsurgical
  42. pain service.]
  43. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111: 461-463
  44. Ferrante M.E., VadeBoncouer T.R. Lechenie posleoperacionnoj boli
  45. Rukovodstvo.[Postoperative Pain
  46. Management. ]
  47. New York, Edinburgh, London, Melbourne,
  48. Tokyo: Churchill Livingstone Publ., 1998; 640.
  49. Morgan G.E., Mikhail M.S. Klinicheskaya anesteziologiya, vtoroe
  50. izdanie. [Clinical anesthesiology, second
  51. edition.]
  52. Prentice-Hall International Inc., 2005; 1064.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2014 ., ., ., ., .

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies