Journal of Experimental and Clinical SurgeryJournal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery2070-478X2409-143XVoronezh State Medical University51010.18499/2070-478X-2011-4-2-234-238UnknownInfl uence of implantation of mechanical and biological prostheses on remodeling left ventricular at patients with aortal insuffi ciencyк.м.н., кардиохирург отделения приобретенных пороков сердца Республиканского специализированного центра хирургии им. академика В.Вахидова г. Ташкента;f.f.turaev@mail.ruк.м.н., торакальный хирург отделения хирургии легких и средостения Республиканского cпециализированного центра хирургии им. академика В.Вахидова г. Ташкентаpahomovgl@mail.ruаспирант отделения приобретенных пороков сердца Республиканского специализированного центра хирургии им. академика В.Вахидова г. Ташкента;lazizpulatov@mail.ruРеспубликанский специализированный центр хирургии им. академика В.Вахидова, Узбекистан24062011422342380305201603052016Copyright © 2011, ., ., .2011394 patients by whom prosthetics aortic the valve is executed are operated. Mechanical valve are implanted 208 patients, biological valve - 21. The estimation of dynamics of functional changes LV is spent to terms from 7 till 15 days after operation. Analyzing data received during research it is possible to conclude, that the best dynamics of the sizes LV, weights of a myocardium, restoration of functional changes МV, the sizes LA occurs at implantation of mechanical artifi cial limbs. At implantation of biological artifi cial limbs we have no signifi cant decrease in fraction of emission LV.acquired heart diseasesaortic valve replacementtwo-leafl etone-leafl et and bio- prosthesisприобретенные пороки сердцапротезирование аортального клапанадвухстворчатыеодностворчатые и биологические протезы[1. Bokeriia L.A., Muratov R.M., Al'-Khadzhabed Kh.F., Britikov D.V., Babenko S.I., Makarenko V.N., Sachkov A.S. Ispol'zovanie legochnogo autografta pri infektsionnom endokardite aortal'nogo klapana. Annaly khirurgii 2005; 5: 10-13.][2. Bokeriia L.A., Muratov R.M., Babenko S.I., Soboleva N.N., Kamolov S.R., Bakuleva N.P. Protezirovanie aortal'nogo klapana ksenoprotezom «BioLAB»: promezhutochnye rezul'taty. Grudnaia i serd.-sosud. khir. 2008; 1: 23-28.][3. Dzemeshkevich S.L., Stivenson L.U., Aleksii-Meskhishvili V.V. Bolezni aortal'nogo klapana. Funktsiia, diagnostika, lechenie. M.: Geotar-Med 2004. 236.][4. Malinovskii I.I., Konstantinov B.A., Dzemeshkevich S.L. Biologicheskie protezy klapanov serdtsa. M.: Meditsina 1988; 186.][5. Edwards M.B., Taylor K.M. A profi le of valve replacement surgery in the UK (1986-1997): a study from the UK heart valve registry. J. Heart Valve Dis. 1999; 8: 6: 697.][6. Kirklin J.K., Smith D., Nowick W. et al. Long-term function of cryopreserved aortic homografts. A ten-year study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1993; 106: 154.][7. Motti-Link S., Wolf I., Hastcntenfel M. et al. Non-invasive assessment of differences between bileatlet and tilting disk aortic valve prosthesis by 3D-Doppler profi ls. Interact. Cardiovasc.Thorac.Surg. 2005; 4: 383-387.][8. Nygaard H., Pulsen P.K., Hasenkan J.M. et al. Quantitation of the turbulent stress distribution downstream of normal, diseased and artifi rial aortic valves in humans. Eur. Cardiothorac. Surg. 1992; 6: 11: 609-617. 9. Sirvydis V., Sudikien R., Lebetkevicius V. et al. Ross operation — modifi cation of technique. Postoperative hemodynamic advantages. Appl. Cardiopulm. Pathophysiol. 2002; 10: 17.][10. Teijeira F.J., Mikhail A.A. Cardiac valve replacement with mechanical prostheses: current status and trends. Advanced in Cardiovascular Engineering. Ed. H.C. Hwang. N.Y.: Plenum Press 1992; 197.][11. Westaby S., Huysmaus H.A., David T.E. Stentless aortic bioprostheses: compelling data from the second international symposium. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1998; 65: 235.]