Experimental validation of the original technique for plastic surgery of extensive posttraumatic diaphragm defects

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. According to modern research studies, including those using polypropylene mesh, the recurrence rate after diaphragm plastic surgery for traumatic, congenital, and postoperative defects varies widely, ranging from 2% to 30% or more.

Aim. To evaluate the morphological and biomechanical features of the diaphragm musculo-aponeurotic structures regarding the application of an original surgical technique for treating patients with extensive post-traumatic diaphragmatic defects.

Materials and methods. An anatomical, morphological, and biomechanical study was conducted on 36 cadavers of both sexes from three age groups (young, middle-aged, and elderly) and various somatotypes. The shape and dimensions of the diaphragm and central tendon, as well as the parameters of hemomicrocirculatory network, the tensile strength, and the modulus of elasticity, were evaluated using the ISS-500 testing device. Additionally, 12 diaphragm specimens were examined after simulating an extensive defect and performing plastic surgery using an original technique. Statistical data were analysed using Statistica 10 (StatSoft, USA).

Results. Somatotype-associated variants in the shape of the diaphragm dome and central tendon were identified, gender-related differences in its dimensions (in men, the values of the sagittal and frontal dimensions were generally larger, with the maximum dimensions observed in brachymorphic and mesomorphic types). In the middle-aged and the elderly, there was a decreased density of the vascular network of the hemimicrocirculatory bed and a tendency towards the decreased tissue strength and elasticity. In the experiment, the original tension-free fixation of the mesh endoprosthesis with reinforcement of the U-shaped suture line using a frame thread resulted in a 71.95% increase in the tensile strength and a 70.41% increase in the modulus of elasticity compared to native diaphragm specimens (p< 0.05), regardless of the patients' somatotype and age.

Conclusion. Age-related and anatomical features of the diaphragm should be considered when planning reconstruction; the proposed technique strengthens the fixation line of the polypropylene mesh and improves the biomechanical reliability of plastic surgery in extensive post-traumatic defects.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Roman V. Korobka

Rostov State Medical University; Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: romankorobka1989@gmail.com

M.D., Associate Professor of the Department of Reconstructive, Cardiovascular, Thoracic, Maxillofacial Surgery and Transplantology

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-Don

Ivan S. Klets

Rostov State Medical University; Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: kletz_is@rostgmu.ru

Assistant Professor of the Department of Reconstructive, Cardiovascular, Thoracic, Maxillofacial Surgery and Transplantology

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-Don

Vyacheslav L. Korobka

Rostov State Medical University; Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: korobka_vl@rostgmu.ru

M.D., Professor, Head of the Department of Reconstructive, Cardiovascular, Thoracic, Maxillofacial Surgery and Transplantology

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-Don

Vladimir K. Tatyanchenko

Rostov State Medical University

Email: vladimirtatyanchenko1949@gmail.com

M.D., Professor, Department of Surgery No. 4

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Arkady B. Lageza

Rostov State Medical University; Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: lagezaab@list.ru

Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of Reconstructive, Cardiovascular, Thoracic, Maxillofacial Surgery and Transplantology

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-Don

Mikhail V. Gonchar

Rostov State Medical University; Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: bayandoc@bk.ru

Assistant Professor of the Department of Reconstructive, Cardiovascular, Thoracic, Maxillofacial Surgery and Transplantology

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-Don

Sergey I. Dudarev

Rostov State Medical University; Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: nislo@mail.ru

Ph.D., Assistant Professor of the Department of Reconstructive, Cardiovascular, Thoracic, Maxillofacial Surgery and Transplantology

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-Don

References

  1. Solli P, Bertolaccini L, Brandolini J, Pardolesi A. Reconstructive techniques after diaphragm resection and use of the diaphragmatic flap in thoracic surgery. Shanghai Chest. 2017; 1(4): 21.1-21.9. doi: 10.21037/shc.2017.08.04.
  2. Plekhanov AN. Epidemiology, diagnostics, and treatment of traumatic diaphragmatic hernias (literature review). Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2011; 1-2: 237-242. (in Russ.)
  3. Davydov MI, Aliev MD, Sobolevsky VA, Ilyushin AL. Surgical treatment of malignant tumors of the chest wall. Vestnik RONTs im. N. N. Blokhina RAMN. 2008; 1: 35-40. (in Russ.)
  4. Parshin VD, Khetagurov MA. Diaphragmatic hernias in planned thoracic surgery. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2018; 8: 36-45. (in Russ.)
  5. Abakumov MM, Shcherbatenko MK, Vladimirova ES, Ermolova IV, Kartavenko VI, Pogodina AN, Kazantsev SV, Abakumov AM, Sharifullin FA. Diagnostics and treatment of diaphragmatic ruptures. Surgery. 2000; 7: 1: 28-33. (in Russ.)
  6. Karamustafaoglu YA, Kuzucuoglu М, Tarladacalisir Т, Yoruk Y. Transabdominal subcostal approach in surgical management of Morgagni hernia. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2011; 39: 6: 1009-1011.
  7. Hanna WC, Ferri LE, Fata P, Razek T, Spicer J. Diaphragmatic hernia repair: what should we expect? Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2016; 59(2): 78-79.
  8. Bhatt NR, McMonagle M. Recurrence in a Laparoscopically Repaired Traumatic Diaphragmatic Hernia: Case Report and Literature Review. Trauma Monthly. 2016; 21: e20421.
  9. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 21.07.2012 № 750 «Ob utverzhdenii Pravil peredachi nevostrebovannogo tela, organov i tkanei umershego cheloveka dlya ispol'zovaniya v meditsinskikh, nauchnykh i uchebnykh tselyakh, a takzhe ispol'zovaniya nevostrebovannogo tela, organov i tkanei umershego cheloveka v ukazannykh tselyakh» (red. ot 17.12.2016). Ofitsial'nyi internet-portal pravovoi informatsii. Moskva, 2012. URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru (data obrashcheniya: 21.05.2026). (in Russ.)
  10. Tat'yanchenko VK, Sarkisyan VA, Andreev EV, Chubaryan KA, Sposob issledovaniya fastsii i kletchatochnykh prostranstv. Patent RF №2271740. 2006; 8. (in Russ.)
  11. Stepanov VS, Tat'yanchenko VK, Ovsyannikov AV. Kontrastnoe sredstvo dlya zalivki sosudov. Avtorskoe svidetel'stvo №1144703 SSSR. 1985; 6. (in Russ.)
  12. Korobka VL, Klets IS, Lageza AB, Korobka RV. Sposob khirurgicheskogo lecheniya obshirnykh posttravmaticheskikh defektov diafragmy. Patent RF №2846270. 2025; 16. (in Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Test device for studying the biomechanical parameters of tissues: a – general view of the device: б – measuring sensor.

Download (89KB)
3. Fig. 2. Diaphragm shape variants in the frontal plane: a – in the form of two domes; b – the domes are not pronounced; c – in the form of one dome.

Download (272KB)
4. Fig. 3. Types of anatomical structure of the central tendon.

Download (155KB)
5. Fig. 4. X-ray angiogram of the human diaphragm in the first mature age period of the mesomorphic body type (contrasting according to V.K. Tatyanchenko's method (author's certificate №1144703 [11]), 1 - lower diaphragmatic arteries.

Download (107KB)
6. Fig 5. Superior midline laparotomy, creating a defect in the muscular part of the diaphragm dome measuring 15x10 cm. 1 – diaphragm defect.

Download (134KB)
7. Fig. 6. Applying U-shaped sutures along the entire perimeter of the diaphragm defect, capturing the frame thread. 1 – diaphragm defect; 2 – U-shaped sutures; 3 – frame thread.

Download (130KB)
8. Fig. 7. The mesh endoprosthesis is stitched with the ends of the U-shaped sutures. 1 – diaphragm defect; 2 – U-shaped sutures; 3 – frame thread; 4 – mesh endoprosthesis.

Download (176KB)
9. Fig. 8. The final stage of the operation. Fixation of the endoprosthesis to the diaphragm defect from the abdominal cavity using a frame thread and U-shaped sutures. 2 – U-shaped sutures; 3 – frame thread, 4 – mesh endoprosthesis, 5 – fixed endoprosthesis using U-shaped sutures and a frame thread.

Download (276KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical University