<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник экспериментальной и клинической хирургии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2070-478X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2409-143X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1291</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18499/2070-478X-2019-12-3-199-202</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Review of literature</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обзор литературы</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Evolution of upper urinary tract drainage method</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Эволюция метода дренирования верхних мочевых путей</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6742-3142</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">8630-2120</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zolotuhin</surname><given-names>Oleg V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Золотухин</surname><given-names>Олег Владимирович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ph.D., associate Professor of Oncology and specialized surgical disciplines of IDPO VSMU N. N. Burdenko, Deputy chief physician for the medical part of the Voronezh region GBUZ VOKB №1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат медицинских наук, доцент кафедры онкологии и специализированных хирургических дисциплин ИДПО</p></bio><email>zolotuhin-o@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1178-2610</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9323-0316</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Madykin</surname><given-names>Yuri Yurievich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мадыкин</surname><given-names>Юрий Юрьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ph.D., associate Professor of Oncology and specialty surgical disciplines IDPO VSMU N. N. Burdenko</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат медицинских наук, доцент кафедры онкологии и специализированных хирургических дисциплин ИДПО</p></bio><email>madykin@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6298-029X</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9609-1316</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Fedorov</surname><given-names>Artur A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Федоров</surname><given-names>Артур Артурович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>urologist of the Department of urology of Tula region "Don city hospital №1" Tula region</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач уролог урологического отделения</p></bio><email>fdrvart@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University&#13;
Voronezh regional clinical hospital №1</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Воронежский государственный медицинский университет им. Н.Н. Бурденко&#13;
Воронежская областная клиническая больница №1</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Воронежский государственный медицинский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Don city hospital №1</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГУЗ Донская городская больница №1.</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2019-09-27" publication-format="electronic"><day>27</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">12-3-2019</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Том 12, №3</issue-title><fpage>199</fpage><lpage>202</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2019-02-10"><day>10</day><month>02</month><year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2019, Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical University</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2019, ФГБОУ ВО ВГМУ им. Н.Н. Бурденко Минздрава России</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical University</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ФГБОУ ВО ВГМУ им. Н.Н. Бурденко Минздрава России</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/about/editorialPolicies</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/article/view/1291">https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/article/view/1291</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Despite the achievements of modern medicine, the method of drainage of the upper urinary tract with obstruction remains an urgent problem in urgent urological practice. The article presents a brief literature review of classical methods of upper urinary tract drainage, such as open nephrostomy and ureteral catheter installation. Special attention is paid to modern methods of drainage of the upper urinary tract. Percutaneous puncture nephrostomy today is one of the most frequently performed operations for the purpose of upper urinary tract drainage in urology, which is used both for medical and diagnostic purposes, which characterizes it as a fairly simple operation and safe for the patient, which has a number of significant drawbacks (wearing a urinal, possible purulent-septic complications, traumatization of the renal parenchyma). In contrast to percutaneous puncture nephrostomy, the urethral stent is devoid of the above disadvantages, however, it has no less significant disadvantages in use (migration, inlay, reflux).</p> <p> </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Несмотря на достижения современной медицины, метод дренирования верхних мочевых путей при обструкции остается актуальной проблемой в ургентной урологической практике. В статье представлен краткий литературный обзор классических способов дренирования верхних мочевых путей, таких как отрытая нефростомия и установка мочеточникового катетера. Особое внимание уделено современным методам дренирования верхних мочевых путей. Чрескожная пункционная нефростомия сегодня одна из наиболее часто выполняемых операций с целью дренирования ВМП в урологии, которая используется как с лечебной, так и с диагностической целью, что характеризует ее как достаточно простую в исполнении и безопасную для пациента операцию, которая имеет ряд существенных недостатков (ношение мочеприемника, возможные гнойно-септические осложнения, травматизация почечной паренхимы). В противоположность к чрескожной пункционной нефростомии мочетониковый стент лишен вышеуказанных недостатков, однако, имеет не менее значительные минусы в использовании (миграция, инкрустация, рефлюкс).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>obstruction</kwd><kwd>drainage</kwd><kwd>ureteral catheter</kwd><kwd>nephrostomy</kwd><kwd>ureteral stent</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>обструкция</kwd><kwd>нефростома</kwd><kwd>стент</kwd><kwd>мочеточниковый катетер</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Doronchuk DN, Shirshov VN. Mochekamennaya bolezn': printsipy drenirovaniya. M. – Vedi. 150.(in Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дорончук Д.Н., Ширшов В.Н. Мочекаменная болезнь: принципы дренирования. М. – Веди. 150.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lopatkin NA. Rukovodstvo po urologii. M. 1998; 1-3. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лопаткин Н.А. Руководство по урологии. М. 1998; 1-3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mudraya IS, Kirpatovskii VI, Martov AG. Functional state of the upper urinary tract during and after remote lithotripsy. Urologiya i nefrologiya. 1998; 4: 6 - 10. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мудрая И.С., Кирпатовский В.И., Мартов А.Г. Функциональное состояние верхних мочевыводящих путей во время выполнения и после дистанционной литотрипсии. Урология и нефрология. 1998; 4: 6 - 10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pytel' YuA, Zolotarev II. Neotlozhnaya urologiya. M.: Meditsina. 1985; 320. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пытель Ю.А., Золотарев И.И. Неотложная урология. М.: Медицина. 1985; 320.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khinman F. Operativnaya urologiya. Atlas. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2007. (in Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хинман Ф. Оперативная урология. Атлас. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Ahn J, Trost DW, Topham SL, Sos TA. Retained nephrostomy thread providing a nidus for atypical renal calcification. Br. J. Radiol. 1997; 70: 309 – 310.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Atallah N, Slaba S, Karam R. Complications of percutaneous nephorostomy. Apropos of 481 procedures: the value of puncture of the median calices. J. Med. Liban. 1999; 47: 2: 92 – 94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Denstedt JD, Reid G, Sofer M. Advances in ureteral stent technology.World J. Urol. 2000; 18: 237 – 242.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ. Complications of ureteral stent placement. Radiografics. 2002; 22: 5: 1005 – 1022.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Chen AS, Saltzman B. Staent use with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J. Endouro. 1993; 7: 2: 155 – 162.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Chew BH, Duvdevani M, Denstedt JD. New developments in ureteral stent design, materials and coatings. Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 2006; 3: 3: 395-403.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Del Boca C, Ferrari C, Dotti E. The combination of extracorporal lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostomy in the treatment of obstructive ureteral urate calculi. Radiol. Med. (Torino). 1994; 87: 4: 498 – 502.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Ferrer MD, Palmero J, Martines – Rodrigo J. Percutaneous nephrostomy. Review of 92 cases. Actas Urol. Esp. 1995; 19: 7: 555 – 560.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Fournier G, Delavierre D, Le Coat R. Percutaneous drainage nephrostomy in patients over 70 years of age. Apropos of 98 nephrostomies in 74 patients. Prog. Urol. 1994; 4: 3: 362 – 370.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Heimbach D, Wirth M, Hofmockel G, Frohmuller H. Are auxiliary methods necessary prior to ESWL in patients with a solitary kidney? Urol. Int. 1994; 52:3: 131 – 134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Hepperlen TW, Mardis HK, Kammandel H. Self-retained internal ureteral stents: a new approach. J. Urol. 1978; 119: 731 – 734.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Hood CG, Dyer RB, Zagoria RJ. Complications of ureteral stenting.Appl. Radiol. 1990; 19: 35 – 42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Leventhal EK, Rozanski TA, Crain TW, Deshon GE. Indwelling ureteral stents as definitive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J. Urol. 1995; 153: 1: 34 – 36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Lee WJ, Patel U, Patel S, Pillari GP. Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy: results and complications. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 1994; 5: 1: 135 – 139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Mattei A, Danuser H. Stents in urology. Ther. Umsch. 2003; 60: 4: P. 233 – 237.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Mischianu D, Vlasin G, Dinu M, Bana M. The indications and limits for the use of stents in urological pathology. Chirurgia (Bucur). 1998; 93: 6: 387 – 394.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Sim LS, Tan BS, Yip SK. Single centre review of radiologically – guided percutaneous nephrostomies: a report of 273 procedures. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore. 2002; 31: 1: 76 – 80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Tazi K, Moudouni SM, Nouri M. Percutaneous nephrostomy: indications, techniques and results. Retrospective study of 81 cases.Ann. Urol. (Paris). 2000; 34: 6: 391 – 397.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Rabii R, Joual A, Rais H. Pyonephrosis: diagnosis and treatment: report of 14 cases. Ann. Urol. (Paris). 2000; 34: 3: 161 – 164.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Van Arsrsdalen KN, Pollack HM, Wein AJ. Ureteral stenting. Semin. Urol. 1984; 2: 180 – 186.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Watson G. Problems with double-J stents and nephrostomy tubes. J. Endourol. 1997; 11: 413 – 417.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Wah TM, Weston MJ, Irving HC. Percutaneous nephrostomy insertion: outcome data from a prospective multi-operator study at a UK training centre. Clin. Radiol. 2004; 59: 3: 255 -261.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Yossepowitch O, Lifshitz DA, Dekel Y. Predicting the success of retrograde stenting for managing ureteral obstruction. J. Urol. 2001; 166: 1746 – 1749.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL. Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cyctoscopically. J. Urol. 1967; 97: 840-844.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
