<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник экспериментальной и клинической хирургии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2070-478X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2409-143X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">284</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18499/2070-478X-2013-6-4-489-492</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Experience</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Опыт работы (архивный)</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The Method of Remodelling of the Inconsistent Scar on the Uterus During Cesarean Section Operation</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Методика ремоделирования неполноценного рубца на матке в ходе операции кесарева сечения</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Бычков</surname><given-names>И.В.</given-names></name><bio xml:lang="en"><p>M.D., Assistant of the Department Obstetrics and Gynecology №2 of VSMA; E-mail</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> к.м.н., ассистент кафедры акушерства и гинекологии №2 ВГМА</p></bio><email>archer-206@ya.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Шмарин</surname><given-names>С.В.</given-names></name><bio xml:lang="en"><p>M.D., Assistant professor of the Department Obstetrics and Gynecology №2 of VSMA</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p> к.м.н., доцент кафедры акушерства и гинекологии №2 ВГМА</p></bio><email>hypoxia@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Бычков</surname><given-names>В.И.</given-names></name><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ph.D., Prof., Head of the Department Obstetrics and Gynecology №2 of VSMA</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.м.н., проф., зав. кафедрой акушерства и гинекологии №2 ВГМА</p></bio><email>val@obg.vrn.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical Academy, 10 Studencheskaia Str., Voronezh, 394036, Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Воронежская государственная медицинская академия им. Н.Н. Бурденко, Воронеж, Российская Федерация</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2013-12-24" publication-format="electronic"><day>24</day><month>12</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>489</fpage><lpage>492</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-04-28"><day>28</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2016-04-28"><day>28</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2013, Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical University</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2013, ФГБОУ ВО ВГМУ им. Н.Н. Бурденко Минздрава России</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical University</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ФГБОУ ВО ВГМУ им. Н.Н. Бурденко Минздрава России</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/about/editorialPolicies</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/article/view/284">https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/article/view/284</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Relevance Following up of a pregnant women with a scar on a uterus is one of actual problems of modern obstetrics. Scarring of uterus wall increase probability of complications, such as fetoplacental insufficiency, fetal hypoxia, threat of interruption of pregnancy. Special danger to life of mother and fetus is represented by an inconsistent scar on a uterus in connection with probability of a rupture of a uterus at pregnancy or childbirth. Restoration of a uterus wound quite often becomes complicated by cutting of threads through fragile scar tissue, bleeding and repeated formation of an inconsistent scar. The purpose of the study was development of a technique of remodeling of an inconsistent scar on a uterus, allowing to restore anatomic and functional full value of the lower segment of a uterus. Materials and methods Research of 122 pregnant women with a inconsistent scar on a uterus who were divided into two groups is conducted. The control group included 57 patients at whom the uterus during Cesarean section was taken in by a traditional technique. The main group was made by 65 women at whom the offered technique of remodeling of a scar on a uterus was used. Results and their discussion During use of the offered technique in comparison with traditional, additional haemostatic sutures on a uterus were imposed 3 times less often, need for application of uterotonic medications was decreased, the total amount of blood loss decreased at operation. By the 4 days after the delivery the average thickness of a scar on a uterus in the main group varied from 7,2 to 8,3 mm, in control group – from 2,9 to 3,4 mm. Important difference was absence of early postnatal bleedings and endometritis at patients in the main group that promoted more favorable current of the postnatal period and formation of a consistent scar on a uterus.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Актуальность Ведение беременных женщин с рубцом на матке – одна из актуальных проблем современного акушерства. Рубцовые изменения стенки матки повышают вероятность осложнений, таких как фетоплацентарная недостаточ- ность, гипоксия плода, угроза прерывания беременности. Особую опасность для жизни матери и плода представляет неполноценный рубец на матке в связи с вероятностью разрыва матки при беременности или родах. Ушивание раны на матке нередко осложняется прорезыванием нитей через хрупкую рубцовую ткань, кровотечением и повторным формиро- ванием неполноценного рубца. Цель исследования Разработка методики ремоделирования несостоятельного рубца на матке, поз-воляющей восстано- вить анатомическую и функциональную полноценность нижнего сегмента матки. Материалы и методы Проведено исследование 122 беременных женщин с неполноценным рубцом на матке, которые были разделены на две группы. В контрольную группу вошли 57 пациенток, у которых матка в ходе кесарева сечения ушивалась по традиционной методике. Основную группу составили 65 женщин, у которых использовалась предложенная методика ремоделирования рубца на матке. Результаты и их обсуждение В ходе использования предложенной методики в сравнении с традиционной, дополнитель- ные гемостатические швы на матке накладывались в 3 раза реже, существенно уменьшилась необходимость в применении утеротонических препаратов, снизился общий объем кровопотери при операции. На 4 сутки после родов средняя толщина рубца на матке в основной группе составила от 7,2 до 8,3 мм, в контрольной группе – от 2,9 до 3,4 мм. Важным отличием является отсутствие ранних послеродовых кровотечений и эндометритов у пациенток в основной группе, что способ- ствовало более благоприятному течению послеродового периода и формированию состоятельного рубца на матке</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Caesarean section, inconsistent scar, reconstruction of the uterine wall</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Кесарево сечение, неполноценный рубец, восстановление стенки матки</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1. Vasil'chenko O.N. Vliiaet li kolichestvo kesarevykh sechenii v anamneze na techenie posleduiushchei beremennosti, operatsii i posleoperatsionnogo perioda? [Does the number of previous caesarean section influence on a subsequent pregnancy, surgery and post-operative period? I Regional Forum "Mother and Child"]. // Kazan. 2007; 35-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2. Gustovarova T.A., Ivanian A.N., Bolvacheva E.V. Beremennost' posle kesareva secheniya: tok, puti dostavkoy. [Pregnancy after cesarean section: current, ways of a delivery.] // Nizhny Novgorod medical journal . 2006; 8:255–257.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>3. Gorbacheva A.V. Diagnostika rubtsa na matke beremennykh, u kotorykh bylo kesarevo secheniye. [Diagnostics status of the scar on the uterus of pregnant who have had cesarean section.] // Obstetrics and gynecology 2008; 1:40−44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>4. Kulakov, V.I., Chernukha E.A. Sovremennyi vzgliad na</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>problemu kesareva secheniia [The modern approach to the</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>problem of caesarean section. I Regional Forum "Mother and</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Child"]. // Kazan, 2007; 85-88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>5. Zalesnyi A.V. Kompleksnaya otsenka rubtsa na matkeposle kesareva secheniya [Comprehensive assessment of the uterine scar after caesarean section.] // Obstetrics and gynecological diseases journal 2010; 59: 5: 118-127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>6. Serov V.N. Kesarevo secheniye v perinatal'nom akusherstve. [Caesarean section in the perinatal obstetrics.] // Russian medical journal . 2004; XII:1: 3-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>7. Savel'eva G.M., Karaganova E.Ia., Kurtser M.A. Kesarevo secheniye kak razdel v sovremennom akusherstve. [Caesarean section in modern obstetrics.] // Obstetrics and gynecology 2007; 2: 3-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>8. Savel'eva G.M., Trofimova O.A. Rol' kesareva secheniya</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>v snizhenii perinatal'noy smertnosti i zabolevayemosti donoshennykh detey. [The role of caesarean section</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>in reducing the perinatal mortality and morbidity of term infants.] //Obstetrics and gynecology. 2008; 4: 20–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>9. Bujold E, Jastrow N, Gauthier R.J. Otsenka skorosti matochnoy truby pri pervom poseshchenii vracha: predvaritel'naya otsenka. [Assessment of the rate of uterine rup-ture at the first prenatal visit: a preliminary evaluation.] // J. Matern Fetal Neonatal. Med. 2008; 21:507–8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>10. Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, Brunet S, Gauthier R.J. Prognozirovaniye polnogo razryva matki po sonograficheskoy otsenke nizhnego segmenta matki. [Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment.] // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 201:320:1–6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>11. Morency A.M., Brassard N., Gauthier RJ. Mozhet li byt' razryv matki u patsiyentov pri vaginal'nykh rodakh posle kesareva secheniya? [Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery be predicted?] // Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196:6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>12. Cheung V.Y. Sonograficheskoye izmereniye nizhnego segmenta matkitolshchina segmenta u zhenshchin s predydushchego kesareva secheniya. [Sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with previous caesarean section.] //J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005; 27: 674–681.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
