<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник экспериментальной и клинической хирургии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2070-478X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2409-143X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">334</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18499/2070-478X-2009-2-2-129-136</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The rectocele and pelvic floor combined pathology surgical treatment results estimation in dependence of operative approach</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Оценка результатов хирургического лечения ректоцеле на фоне комбинированной патологии тазового дна и в зависимости от оперативного доступа</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Наумов</surname><given-names>А.В.</given-names></name><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач-колопроктолог колопроктологического отделения Белгородской областной клинической больницы святителя Иоасафа.</p></bio><email>oleynik_nv@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kуликовский</surname><given-names>В.Ф.</given-names></name><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор медицинских наук, профессор, главный врач Белгородской областной клинической больницы святителя Иоасафа, руководитель регионарного колопроктологического центра, заведующий кафедрой клинических дисциплин ИПМО Белгородского государственного университета.</p></bio><email>okb@bel.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Олейник</surname><given-names>Н.В.</given-names></name><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор медицинских наук, врач-колопроктолог колопроктологического отделения Белгородской областной клинической больницы святителя Иоасафа, профессор кафедры клинических дисциплин ИПМО Белгородского государственного университета.</p></bio><email>oleynik_nv@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en"></institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Белгородская областная клиническая больница святителя Иоасафа Белгородский государственный университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2009-06-24" publication-format="electronic"><day>24</day><month>06</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>129</fpage><lpage>136</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-04-30"><day>30</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2016-04-30"><day>30</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2009, ., ., .</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2009, Наумов А., Kуликовский В., Олейник Н.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">., ., .</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Наумов А., Kуликовский В., Олейник Н.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/article/view/334">https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/article/view/334</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The results of surgical treatment by means of transvaginal, transperineal, transanal and combined approaches of 200 patients with II-III degree of rectocele were analyzed. The transvaginal approach is the best when combined enterocele, proximal rectocele or anal incontinence needed sphincteroplasty take place. Suppurative inflammation and sexual disorders are less due to transperineal approach. The usage of transanal approach is better when also cutting of rectal mucosal prolapse needed.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Анализировали результаты лечения 200 пациенток с ректоцеле II-III степени, оперированных трансвагинальным, трансперинеальным, трансанальным и комбинированным доступами. Трансвагинальный доступ имеет преимуще- ства, если помимо ректоцеле у пациентки имеется грыжа ректровагинальной перегородки, верхнее ректоцеле, при недостаточности анального сфинктера, когда нужно произвести сфинктеропластику. При промежностном доступе меньше риск развития воспалительных осложнений и нарушения половой функции. Трансанальный доступ вы- годнее при сопутствующем проляпсе слизистой, так как одновременно удаляется избыток слизистой прямой кишки.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>rectocele</kwd><kwd>levatoroplasty</kwd><kwd>operative approach</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ректоцеле</kwd><kwd>леваторопластика</kwd><kwd>оперативные доступы</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>1.Afendulov S.A., Sheptunov Iu.M., Tarasenko S.A. i dr. Vybor metoda khirurgicheskogo lecheniia rektotsele. [The choice of method of surgical treatment of rectocele.] Akt.problemy koloproktologii. I s"ezd koloproktologovRossii s mezhdunar. uchastiem: tez. dokl. Samara 2003;-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>2.Makarov R.R., Gabelov A.A. Operativnaia ginekologiia. [Operative gynecology.] -e izd. M: Meditsina 1979; 328.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Mudrov A.A., Shelygin Iu.A., Titov A.Iu. i dr. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie rektotsele perineal'noanal'nym dostupom.[Surgical treatment of rectocele perinealnoanalnym access]. Akt. voprosy koloproktologii: tez. dokl. I s"ezda koloproktologov Rossii s mezhdunar. uchastiem.Samara 2003; 97-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>3.Osnovy koloproktologii.[Basics of Coloproctology.] Pod red. G.I.Vorob'eva.Rostov-na-Donu: izd-vo «Feniks» 2001; 416.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Fedorov V.D., Dul'tsev Iu.V. Proktologiia.[Proctology] M.: Meditsina 1984; 384.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>4.Shelygin Iu.A., Titov A.Iu., Podmarenkova L.F. i dr.Vybor metoda khirurgicheskogo lecheniia rektotsele.[The choice of method of surgical treatment of rectocele] Akt.problemy koloproktologii: tez. dokl. Rostov-na-Donu; 84-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>5.Brubaker L. Rectocele. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1996: 5: 876-879.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>6.Burrows L.J., Sewell C., Leffler K.S. et al.Tochnost' klinicheskoi otsenki posteriorvaginal defektov stenki. [The accuracy of clinical evaluation of posteriorvaginal wall defects.] Int.Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003; 14: 3: 160-163.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>6.Glavind K., Madsen H. Perspektivnoe issledovanie diskretnogo fastsial'naia defekta Rektotsele remonta. [A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair.] Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 79: 2: 145-147.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>7.Graul E., Hurst B.Al'ternativnyi podkhod k remontu cystoceles i rectoceles.[ An alternative approach to the repair of cystoceles and rectoceles.] Obstet gynecol 2001; 97: 4:Suppl. 1: 48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>8.Kahn M.A., Stanton S.L. Metody Rektotsele remonta i ikh vliianie na funktsii kishechnika. [Techniques of rectocele repair and their effects on bowel function.] Int urogynecol J pelvic foordy sfunct 1998; 9: 1: 37-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>9.Lehur P.A., Kahn X., Hamy A. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie perednego rektotsele u zhenshchin. Peritoneal'nogo-vaginal'nyi podkhod.[Surgical treatment of anterior rectoceles in women. The peritoneal-vaginal approach.] Ann chir – 2000; 125: 8: 782-786.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>10.Mellgren A., Lopez A., Schultz I. et al. Rektotsele v sviazannyi s paradoksal'noi reaktsiei anal'nogo sfinktera. [Rectocele in associated with paradoxical anal sphincter reaction.] Int J Colorectal Dis 1998; 13: 1: 13-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>11.Murthy V.K., Orkin B.A., Smith L.E. et al. Otlichnyi rezul'tat, ispol'zuia kriterii vybora dlia Rektotsele remonta. [Excellent outcome using selective criteria for rectocele repair.] Dis colon rectum 1996; 39: 4: 374-378.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>12.Rovner E.S., Ginsberg D.A. Zadnei stenki vlagalishcha prolaps: transvaginal'noe remont tazovoi relaksatsii pola, rektotsele i promezhnosti vialosti. [Posterior vaginal wall prolapse: transvaginal repair of pelvic floor relaxation, rectocele, and perineal laxity.] Tech urol 2001; 7: 2: 161-168.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>13.Thompson J.S. Uluchshaet li defekatsii remont rektotsele? [Does repairing rectoceles improve defecation?] Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 12: 3404-3405.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Tjandra J.J., Ooi B.S., Tang C.L. et al.Transanal'noi remont rektotsele ispravliaet obstruktivnoi defekatsii, esli on ne sviazan s anismus. [Transanal repair of rectocele corrects obstructive defecation if it is notassociated with anismus.]Dis solon rectum 1999; 42: 12:-1550.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>14.Van Dam J.H., Hop W.C., Schouten W.R. Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair. Dis solon rectum 2000; 43: 11: 1556-1560.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
