<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник экспериментальной и клинической хирургии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2070-478X</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2409-143X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">443</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18499/2070-478X-2011-4-4-784-790</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The radiofrequency ablation as alternative and addition to surgical treatment at liver tumors</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Радиочастотная аблация как альтернатива и дополнение к хирургическому лечению при опухолях печени</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Жукова</surname><given-names>Ю.Г.</given-names></name><bio xml:lang="en"><p>.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Жукова Юлия Геннадьевна – доктор медицины, врач-ассистент клиники общей и висцеральной хирургии, г. Франкфурт-на-Одере, Германия</p></bio><email>author@vestnik-surgery.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Айзеле</surname><given-names>Р.М.</given-names></name><bio xml:lang="en"><p>.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Айзеле Р.М – доктор медицины, врач клиники общей, висцеральной и трансплантхирургии Шарите, клиника Вирхова, г. Берлин, Германия</p></bio><email>author@vestnik-surgery.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Клиника общей и висцеральной хирургии, г. Франкфурт-на-Одере&#13;
Клиника общей, висцеральной и трансплантхирургии Шарите, клиника Вирхова&#13;
Хирургическая клиника, г. Брауншвейг</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Клиника общей и висцеральной хирургии, г. Франкфурт-на-Одере Клиника общей, висцеральной и трансплантхирургии Шарите, клиника Вирхова Хирургическая клиника, г. Брауншвейг</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2011-12-24" publication-format="electronic"><day>24</day><month>12</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>784</fpage><lpage>790</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-05-02"><day>02</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2016-05-02"><day>02</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2011, ., .</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2011, Жукова Ю., Айзеле Р.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">., .</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Жукова Ю., Айзеле Р.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/article/view/443">https://vestnik-surgery.com/journal/article/view/443</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The treatment of primary and secondary liver tumours has become more and more important over the last years, which is</p><p>probably due to the increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases. . Local tumour</p><p>therapy is an important alternative or complementary procedure to surgical resection. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is</p><p>the most significant one. The most severe constraint is re-occurrence at site of ablation. Whereas factors influencing local</p><p>recurrence rates have been determined, little is known about the timespan within local recurrence (LR) is to be expected, and</p><p>further treatment options. Between 01.01.2001 to 01.10.2008, 180 patients with 223 tumours ablations were examined . All</p><p>procedures were conducted under general anesthesia. The follow-up observation period lasted up until 15.11.2008. Due to the</p><p>high frequency of local tumour recurrence, a close follow-up every 3 month during the first year and every 6 month during</p><p>the second year, and thereafter once a year during the third, fourth and fifth year, is highly recommended. 223 RFAs in 180</p><p>patients were enrolled. Percutaneous access was chosen in 85 cases (47,2%), laparoscopic in 15 (8,3%) and open surgical in 80</p><p>cases (44,5%). Indications were primary liver tumors in 114 (63,3%) and metastases in 66 cases (36,7%). The presented study</p><p>shows that local tumour recurrence occurs more frequently in HCC with 72,5% compared to 48% in colorectal metastases.</p><p>The majority of LRs (71%) occurred within 9 months after the RFA despite observations beyond 2 years following the</p><p>treatment. However in all cases of local tumour recurence the further treatment either surgically or locally - usually with</p><p>RFA - was initially successful. 75% of LR could be treated by targeted interventions (RFA, n= 18, 53%, LITT-Laser-induced</p><p>Interstitial Thermotherapy, n=2,6%, brachytherapy, n=2, 6% or TACE-transarterial Chemoembolization, n=2,6%) or</p><p>resection (n=6,18%); 4 patients underwent liver transplantation (11%). Local recurrence can be considered rather common</p><p>after RFA. Follow-on treatment is feasible in approximately 75% of LR. Factors influencing the secondary success of repeated</p><p>procedures have yet to be determined.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p/><p>Лечение первичных и вторичных опухолей печени приобретает последнее время все большее значение в результа</p><p>-</p><p>те роста случаев гепатоцеллюлярной карциномы (ГЦР) и колоректальных метастазов печени. Локальная терапия</p><p>опухоли - важное альтернативное и/или дополнительное вмешательство к хирургической резекции. Радиочастотная </p><p>аблация (РЧА) является самым показательным примером. Самое серьезное ограничение - возникновение локально</p><p>-</p><p>го рецидива на месте проведения аблации. Принимая во внимание то, что факторы, влияющие на вероятность воз</p><p>-</p><p>никновения локальных рецидивов, были уже определены, о временном промежутке до возникновения локальных</p><p>рецидивов, а также о вариантах их дальнейшего лечения данных не много. В период с 01.01.2001 г. по 01.10.2008</p><p>г.</p><p>проведено 223 аблации у 180 пациентов. Все вмешательства проводились под общей анестезией. Последующий пе</p><p>-</p><p>риод наблюдения продлился до 15.11.2008 г. Из-за высокой частоты локального рецидивирования, рекомендуется</p><p>обследование каждые 3 месяца в течение первого года, каждые 6 месяцев в течение второго года, затем один раз в год</p><p>в течение третьего, четвертого и пятого. Чрескожный доступ выбран в 85 случаях (47,2 %), лапароскопический в 15</p><p>(8,3 %) и открытый хирургический в 80 случаях (44,5 %). Показаниями к проведению аблации были первичные опу</p><p>-</p><p>холи печени в 114 (63,3 %) и метастазы в 66 случаях (36,7 %). Данное исследование показывает, что локальное реци</p><p>-</p><p>дивирование происходит чаще при ГЦР, в 72,5 % случаях, в то время как при колоректальных метастазах – в 48%.</p><p>Большинство локальных рецидивов (71 %) возникло в течение 9 месяцев после РЧА. Во всех случаях локального</p><p>рецидивирования дальнейшее лечение, хирургическое или локальное – чаще с РЧА - было первоначально успешно.</p><p>75% локальных рецидивов подверглись терапии (РЧА, n = 18, 53%, ЛИТТ - лазериндуцированная термотерапия,</p><p>n=2, 6 %, брахитерапия, n=2,6 %, ТАХЭ - трансартериальная химиоэмболизация, n=2,6 %) или резекции (n=6,18 %);</p><p>4 пациентам трансплантировали печень (11 %). Локальное рецидивирование считается довольно частым явлением</p><p>после РЧА. Последующее лечение локальных рецидивов выполнимо приблизительно в 75 % случаев. Факторы,</p>влияющие на дальнейший успех повторных процедур, должны ещё быть определены</trans-abstract><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>The treatment of primary and secondary liver tumours has become more and more important over the last years, which is probably due to the increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases. . Local tumour therapy is an important alternative or complementary procedure to surgical resection. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the most significant one. The most severe constraint is re-occurrence at site of ablation. Whereas factors influencing local recurrence rates have been determined, little is known about the timespan within local recurrence (LR) is to be expected, and further treatment options. Between 01.01.2001 to 01.10.2008, 180 patients with 223 tumours ablations were examined . All procedures were conducted under general anesthesia. The follow-up observation period lasted up until 15.11.2008. Due to the high frequency of local tumour recurrence, a close follow-up every 3 month during the first year and every 6 month during the second year, and thereafter once a year during the third, fourth and fifth year, is highly recommended. 223 RFAs in 180 patients were enrolled. Percutaneous access was chosen in 85 cases (47,2%), laparoscopic in 15 (8,3%) and open surgical in 80 cases (44,5%). Indications were primary liver tumors in 114 (63,3%) and metastases in 66 cases (36,7%). The presented study shows that local tumour recurrence occurs more frequently in HCC with 72,5% compared to 48% in colorectal metastases. The majority of LRs (71%) occurred within 9 months after the RFA despite observations beyond 2 years following the treatment. However in all cases of local tumour recurence the further treatment either surgically or locally - usually with RFA - was initially successful. 75% of LR could be treated by targeted interventions (RFA, n= 18, 53%, LITT-Laser-induced Interstitial Thermotherapy, n=2,6%, brachytherapy, n=2, 6% or TACE-transarterial Chemoembolization, n=2,6%) or resection (n=6,18%); 4 patients underwent liver transplantation (11%). Local recurrence can be considered rather common after RFA. Follow-on treatment is feasible in approximately 75% of LR. Factors influencing the secondary success of repeated procedures have yet to be determined.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
