Modern semiotics of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Acute adhesive intestinal obstruction is the most serious late postoperative complication. Postoperative mortality in violation
of passage of intestinal contents, caused by adhesions formed as high as 15%. The structure of urgent surgical pathology
adhesive ileus is a leader. According to the literature, the implementation of minimally invasive interventions, the perfection
of suture material and so should reduce the number of patients with this postoperative complication. The paper presents an
analysis of patient diagnosed with acute intestinal obstruction admitted to the surgical department of Belgorod City Clinical
Hospital. Studied medical history, condition at admission, clinical manifestations of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction,
evaluated the diagnostic possibilities of instrumental methods of examination. Shows the dynamics of referral of patients for
the years analyzed, as well as the tactics of treatment and outcome of disease.

About the authors

Курский государственный медицинский университет Городская клиническая больница №1 г. Белгорода

Author for correspondence.
Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com

д.м.н., проф., зав.
кафедрой хирургических болезней ФПО, ректор
Курского государственного медицинского универ-ситета; e-mail: drli@yandex.ru

Курский государственный медицинский университет Городская клиническая больница №1 г. Белгорода

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com

к.м.н., доц. ка-федры оперативной хирургии и топографической
анатомии Курского государственного медицинско-го университета; e-mail: drli@yandex.ru

Курский государственный медицинский университет Городская клиническая больница №1 г. Белгорода

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com

к.м.н., главный
врач городской клинической больницы, г. Белгород;
e-mail: drli@yandex.ru

Курский государственный медицинский университет Городская клиническая больница №1 г. Белгорода

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com

врач детский хи-рург областной детской клинической больницы, г.
Белгород; e-mail: drli@yandex.ru

Курский государственный медицинский университет Городская клиническая больница №1 г. Белгорода

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com
студент лечебно-го факультета Курского государственного медицин-ского университета; e-mail: drli@yandex.ru

Курский государственный медицинский университет Городская клиническая больница №1 г. Белгорода

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com

студент лечебного
факультета Курского государственного медицин-ского университета; e-mail: drli@yandex.ru

References

  1. Beburishvili A.G., Mikhin I.V., Vorob'ev A.A. Primene-nie maloinvazivnykh vmeshatel'stv v usloviiakh ostroi
  2. spaechnoi kishechnoi neprokhodimosti [Application of minimally invasive interventions in acute
  3. adhesive intestinal obstruction]. Materialy Vse-rossiiskogo nauchnogo foruma khirurgii. 2005; 23-24.
  4. Vorob'ev A.A. Spaechnaia bolezn' briushnoi polosti, en-doskopicheskaia khirurgiia [Adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity, endoscopic surgery]. M. 2003; 204.
  5. Zhenechevskii R.A. Spaechnaia bolezn' [Adhesive disease]. M.: Meditsina.
  6. ; 192
  7. Kovalenko A.A., Veselov Iu.A., Levin L.A. Struktura
  8. letal'nosti pri ostrykh khirurgicheskikh zabolevaniiakh
  9. organov briushnoi polosti i rol' endovideokhirurgi-cheskoi tekhnologii v ee snizhenii [Structure
  10. mortality in acute surgical diseases
  11. abdominal organs and the role endovideosurgery technology in its decline]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2009; 2: 80-95.
  12. Legostaeva T.B., Kirillova N.Iu. Ul'trazvu kovaia dia-gnostika ostroi spaechnoi kishechnoi neprokhodimosti [Ultrasound diagnosis of acute adhesive intestinal obstruction].
  13. Radiologiia– praktika. 2002; 2: 17-21.
  14. Lubianskii V.G., Komleva I.B. Effektivnost' lecheniia
  15. konglomeratnykh form spaechnoi kishechnoi neprokhodi-mosti s primeneniem eiunotransverzoanastomoza [Effectiveness of treatment
  16. conglomerate forms of adhesive intestinal obstruction with eyunotransverzoanastomosis]. Khi-rurgiia. Zhu rnal im. N. I. Pirogova. 2009; 3: 29-32.
  17. Mikhin I.V., Beburishvili A.G., Gushul A.V. Biulleten'
  18. Volgogradskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAMN. 2010; 2: 40-44.
  19. Netiaga A.A., Lipatov V.A., Gaidukova L.V. Izuchenie
  20. protsessov regeneratsii briushiny v izolirovannykh us-loviiakh. Chelovek i ego zdorov'e [Study
  21. regeneration of the peritoneum in isolated DC-ditions. Human health]. 2005; 2: 57-63.
  22. Starokon' P.M., Shashkina M.K. Kachestvo zhizni pa-tsientov so spaechnoi bolezn'iu briushnoi polosti [Quality of life in patients with adhesive disease of the abdominal cavity]. Sa-ratovskii nauchno-meditsinskii zhurnal. 2008; 4: 22:
  23. -122.
  24. Stupin V.A., Mikhailusov S.V. Ul'trazvu kovaia dia-gnostika kishechnoi neprokhodimosti [Ultrasound diagnosis of intestinal obstruction-quark]. Vestnik RGMU.
  25. ; 5: 58: 13-20.
  26. Tomniuk N.D., Beloborodov V.A. K voprosu o spaikakh i
  27. spaechnoi bolezni v neotlozhnoi khirurgii. Sovremen-nye naukoemkie tekhnologii [On the question of spikes and
  28. adhesive disease in emergency surgery. Modern high technologies]. 2010; 10: 84-86.
  29. Chekmazov I.A. Spaechnaia bolezn' briushiny [Adhesive disease of the peritoneum]. M.: GEO-TAR-Media. 2008; 160.
  30. DiZerega G.S., Campeau J.D. Peritoneal'nyj remont i formirovanie posleoperacionnoj adgezii [Peritoneal repair and postsurgical adhesion formation]. Hum. Reprod. 2001; 7: 6: 547-555.
  31. Peritoneal'nye spajki: jetiologija, patofiziologija i klinicheskoe
  32. znachenie. Pishhevaritel'naja hirurgija [Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology and clinical
  33. significance. Digestive Sugery]. 2001; 18: 260-273

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2012 ., ., ., ., ., .

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies