The rectocele and pelvic floor combined pathology surgical treatment results estimation in dependence of operative approach


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The results of surgical treatment by means of transvaginal, transperineal, transanal and combined approaches of 200 patients with II-III degree of rectocele were analyzed. The transvaginal approach is the best when combined enterocele, proximal rectocele or anal incontinence needed sphincteroplasty take place. Suppurative inflammation and sexual disorders are less due to transperineal approach. The usage of transanal approach is better when also cutting of rectal mucosal prolapse needed.

About the authors

Белгородская областная клиническая больница святителя Иоасафа Белгородский государственный университет

Author for correspondence.
Email: oleynik_nv@mail.ru
врач-колопроктолог колопроктологического отделения Белгородской областной клинической больницы святителя Иоасафа.

Белгородская областная клиническая больница святителя Иоасафа Белгородский государственный университет

Email: okb@bel.ru
доктор медицинских наук, профессор, главный врач Белгородской областной клинической больницы святителя Иоасафа, руководитель регионарного колопроктологического центра, заведующий кафедрой клинических дисциплин ИПМО Белгородского государственного университета.

Белгородская областная клиническая больница святителя Иоасафа Белгородский государственный университет

Email: oleynik_nv@mail.ru
доктор медицинских наук, врач-колопроктолог колопроктологического отделения Белгородской областной клинической больницы святителя Иоасафа, профессор кафедры клинических дисциплин ИПМО Белгородского государственного университета.

References

  1. Afendulov S.A., Sheptunov Iu.M., Tarasenko S.A. i dr. Vybor metoda khirurgicheskogo lecheniia rektotsele. [The choice of method of surgical treatment of rectocele.] Akt.problemy koloproktologii. I s"ezd koloproktologovRossii s mezhdunar. uchastiem: tez. dokl. Samara 2003;-25.
  2. Makarov R.R., Gabelov A.A. Operativnaia ginekologiia. [Operative gynecology.] -e izd. M: Meditsina 1979; 328.
  3. Mudrov A.A., Shelygin Iu.A., Titov A.Iu. i dr. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie rektotsele perineal'noanal'nym dostupom.[Surgical treatment of rectocele perinealnoanalnym access]. Akt. voprosy koloproktologii: tez. dokl. I s"ezda koloproktologov Rossii s mezhdunar. uchastiem.Samara 2003; 97-99.
  4. Osnovy koloproktologii.[Basics of Coloproctology.] Pod red. G.I.Vorob'eva.Rostov-na-Donu: izd-vo «Feniks» 2001; 416.
  5. Fedorov V.D., Dul'tsev Iu.V. Proktologiia.[Proctology] M.: Meditsina 1984; 384.
  6. Shelygin Iu.A., Titov A.Iu., Podmarenkova L.F. i dr.Vybor metoda khirurgicheskogo lecheniia rektotsele.[The choice of method of surgical treatment of rectocele] Akt.problemy koloproktologii: tez. dokl. Rostov-na-Donu; 84-85.
  7. Brubaker L. Rectocele. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1996: 5: 876-879.
  8. Burrows L.J., Sewell C., Leffler K.S. et al.Tochnost' klinicheskoi otsenki posteriorvaginal defektov stenki. [The accuracy of clinical evaluation of posteriorvaginal wall defects.] Int.Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003; 14: 3: 160-163.
  9. Glavind K., Madsen H. Perspektivnoe issledovanie diskretnogo fastsial'naia defekta Rektotsele remonta. [A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair.] Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 79: 2: 145-147.
  10. Graul E., Hurst B.Al'ternativnyi podkhod k remontu cystoceles i rectoceles.[ An alternative approach to the repair of cystoceles and rectoceles.] Obstet gynecol 2001; 97: 4:Suppl. 1: 48.
  11. Kahn M.A., Stanton S.L. Metody Rektotsele remonta i ikh vliianie na funktsii kishechnika. [Techniques of rectocele repair and their effects on bowel function.] Int urogynecol J pelvic foordy sfunct 1998; 9: 1: 37-47.
  12. Lehur P.A., Kahn X., Hamy A. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie perednego rektotsele u zhenshchin. Peritoneal'nogo-vaginal'nyi podkhod.[Surgical treatment of anterior rectoceles in women. The peritoneal-vaginal approach.] Ann chir – 2000; 125: 8: 782-786.
  13. Mellgren A., Lopez A., Schultz I. et al. Rektotsele v sviazannyi s paradoksal'noi reaktsiei anal'nogo sfinktera. [Rectocele in associated with paradoxical anal sphincter reaction.] Int J Colorectal Dis 1998; 13: 1: 13-16.
  14. Murthy V.K., Orkin B.A., Smith L.E. et al. Otlichnyi rezul'tat, ispol'zuia kriterii vybora dlia Rektotsele remonta. [Excellent outcome using selective criteria for rectocele repair.] Dis colon rectum 1996; 39: 4: 374-378.
  15. Rovner E.S., Ginsberg D.A. Zadnei stenki vlagalishcha prolaps: transvaginal'noe remont tazovoi relaksatsii pola, rektotsele i promezhnosti vialosti. [Posterior vaginal wall prolapse: transvaginal repair of pelvic floor relaxation, rectocele, and perineal laxity.] Tech urol 2001; 7: 2: 161-168.
  16. Thompson J.S. Uluchshaet li defekatsii remont rektotsele? [Does repairing rectoceles improve defecation?] Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 12: 3404-3405.
  17. Tjandra J.J., Ooi B.S., Tang C.L. et al.Transanal'noi remont rektotsele ispravliaet obstruktivnoi defekatsii, esli on ne sviazan s anismus. [Transanal repair of rectocele corrects obstructive defecation if it is notassociated with anismus.]Dis solon rectum 1999; 42: 12:-1550.
  18. Van Dam J.H., Hop W.C., Schouten W.R. Analysis of patients with poor outcome of rectocele repair. Dis solon rectum 2000; 43: 11: 1556-1560.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2009 ., ., .

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies