Abstract

The purpose of the study - a complex estimation of range of motion of the damaged joint, changes immunological laboratory indications and indications of antioxidant protection of patients with at cemented and cementless total hip replacements. The study included two groups of patients with which it is established cemented joint replacements (36 person), and cementless joint replacements (52 persons) and 30 healthy persons as control group of comparison. The received results demonstrate the advantage of cementless hip replacement over the cemented one. It is expressed in the absence of statistically significant differences in terms of restoring range of motion in the operated joint, on a background of significant improvement of the dynamics of the immunological status and indicators of the antioxidant protection in three months after operative intervention.

About the authors

Воронежская государственная медицинская академия им. Н.Н.Бурденко

Author for correspondence.
Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com
аспирант кафедры травмато- логии и ортопедии Воронежской государственной медицинской академии им. Н.Н.Бурденко

References

  1. Kavalerskii G.M. i dr. Otsenka blizhaishikh rezul'tatov
  2. total'nogo endoprotezirovaniia kolennogo sustava.
  3. Vestnik travmatologii i ortopedii 2009; 1: 29.
  4. Moskalev V.P. i dr. Meditsinskie i sotsial'nye pro-
  5. blemy endoprotezirovaniia sustavov konechnostei SPb.
  6. ; 265

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2010 .

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies