Abstract

The analysis of the results of diagnosis and treatment of 60 patients with the diffuse purulent peritonitis. The first (control) group consist of 34 patients treated by programmed sanitations of the abdominal cavity with application by common method without intra-abdominal pressure using to close laparostomy, which was closed by the “zipper” method. The second (study) group included 26 patients, for which there were used a large-cellular mesh polypropylene endoprosthesis to close the defects of abdominal wall. At each programmed sanitation the prosthesis was dissected longitudinally along the entire length and stapled so that the level of intra-abdominal pressure did not exceed 15 mm Hg. In the nearest post-operative period in patients of the second group the indicators of endotoxicosis were 1,3 times lower, the motility and peristalsis of the intestines was 2,1 times higher than in patients of the first group, which led to the decrease of post-operative lethality in 1,3 times

About the authors

.

Author for correspondence.
Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com
.

.

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com
.

.

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com
.

.

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com
.

.

Email: author@vestnik-surgery.com
.

References

  1. Gel'fand B.R., Protsenko D.N., Ignatenko O.V., Iaroshets-
  2. kii A.I. Sindrom intraabdominal'noi gipertenzii.
  3. Consilium medicum 2005; 7: 1: 20-25.
  4. Gostishchev V.K., Sazhin V.P., Avdovenko A.P. Peritonit.
  5. M.: GO-TAR i MED, 2002; 224.
  6. Eriukhin I.A., Shliapnikov S.A. Khirurgicheskii sepsis
  7. (diskussionnye aspekty problemy). Khirurgiia 2000; 3:
  8. -46.
  9. Savel'ev V.S., Gel'fand B.R., Filimonov M.I. Perito-
  10. nit. - M.: Litera, 2006; 206.
  11. Sazhin V.P., Avdovenko A.P., Iurishev V.A. Sovremen-
  12. nye tendentsii khirurgicheskogo lecheniia peritonita.
  13. Khirurgiia 2007; 11: 36-39.
  14. Svetukhin A.M., Zviagin A.K., Slepnev S.Iu. Sistema ob"-
  15. ektivnoi otsenki tiazhesti sostoianiia bol'nykh. Chast' I.
  16. Khirurgiia 2002; 9: 51-57.
  17. Fedorov V.D., Gostishchev V.K., Ermolov A.S., Bagnitskaia
  18. T.N. Sovremennye predstavleniia o klassifikatsii pe-
  19. ritonita i sistemakh otsenki tiazhesti bol'nykh. Khirur-
  20. giia 2000; 4: 58-62.
  21. Cheatham M.L. Intra-abdominal hypertension and
  22. abdominal compartment syndrome. New Horizons: Sci.
  23. and Pract. Acute Med. 1999; 7: 96-115.
  24. Eddy V., Nunn C., Morris J. Abdominal compartment
  25. syndrome. The Nashville experience. Surg. Clin. North
  26. Am. 1997; 77: 801-812.
  27. Malbrain M.L. Abdominal pressure in the critically ill.
  28. Curr. Opinion Crit. Care 2000; 6: 17-29.
  29. Sigel B., Golub R.M., Loiacono L.A. et al. Technique
  30. of ultrasonic detection and mapping of abdominal wall
  31. adhesions. Surg. Endosc 1991; 5: 161-165.
  32. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short form
  33. health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item
  34. selection. Med. Care 1992; 30: 473-483.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2010 ., ., ., ., .

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies